翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ NASA Space Flight Medal ・ NASA Space Radiation Laboratory ・ NASA Space Settlement Contest ・ NASA Space Universe ・ NASA space-flown Robbins medallions of the Apollo missions ・ NASA spin-off technologies ・ NASA standard detonator ・ NASA Standard Spacecraft Computer-I ・ NASA Star and Exoplanet Database ・ NASA STI Program ・ NASA Sustainability Base ・ Nasa tabularis ・ NASA Tech Briefs ・ NASA Trilogy ・ NASA TV ・ NASA v. Nelson ・ NASA Visitor Center (Wallops Flight Facility) ・ NASA wind turbines ・ NASA World Wind ・ NASA X ・ NASA X-38 ・ NASA X-43 ・ NASA's PlanetQuest ・ NASA's Space Place ・ NASA's Story ・ NASA-TLX ・ NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database ・ NASAA ・ Nasaan Ka Elisa? ・ Nasaan Ka Man Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク NASA v. Nelson ： ウィキペディア英語版 NASA v. Nelson ''NASA v. Nelson'', No. 09-530 (2011), was a recent case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that NASA's background checks of contract employees did not violate any constitutional privacy right. ==Background== In 2004, President George W. Bush, on the recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, issued a directive ordering new, uniform identification standards for federal employees, including contract employees. Previously, federal contract employees were not generally required to undergo background investigation, except as required by specific contracts. Pursuant to this directive, the Department of Commerce mandated that contract employees with long-term access to federal facilities must complete a background check and set an October 2007 deadline for completion of this effort. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), a NASA facility that is operated by the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) under government contract and hence is staffed entirely by contract employees, was subject to this requirement. In January 2007, NASA modified its contract with Caltech to include a new background-check requirement. All employees of JPL, including those deemed in low-risk positions, were informed that they must complete the OPM form SF-85, which included an open-ended authorization to release effectively all personal information, or else they would be voluntarily terminated. In August 2007, 28 JPL scientists and engineers including lead plaintiff Robert "Half" Nelson, a senior research scientist at JPL, sued NASA, Caltech, and the Department of Commerce in the District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the background-check requirement violated a constitutional right to informational privacy. The district court denied a motion for a preliminary injunction, but the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's order. The circuit court held that portions of the background-check forms were likely unconstitutional, particularly portions requiring disclosure of drug treatment or counseling (which the court questioned whether the government had a legitimate interest in requiring), as well as open-ended questions soliciting "any adverse information" concerning financial integrity, mental stability, and "other matters" (which the court doubted were narrowly tailored to meet legitimate interests). The Ninth Circuit later denied rehearing en banc. The government appealed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「NASA v. Nelson」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.